It's an Ancient Russian Proverb

(I doubt it's one that you've heard)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

I’m going to try saying some crazy things to you, and you listen crazily—how about it? - Zuangzi
Posts tagged “society”

The problem that needs to be fixed is not kick all the girls out of YA, it’s teach boys that stories featuring female protagonists or written by female authors also apply to them. Boys fall in love. Boys want to be important. Boys have hopes and fears and dreams and ambitions. What boys also have is a sexist society in which they are belittled for “liking girl stuff.” Male is neutral, female is specific.

I heard someone mention that Sarah Rees Brennan’s THE DEMON’S LEXICON would be great for boys, but they’d never read it with that cover. Friends, then the problem is NOT with the book. It’s with the society that’s raising that boy. It’s with the community who inculcated that boy with the idea that he can’t read a book with an attractive guy on the cover.

Here’s how we solve the OMG SO MANY GIRLS IN YA problem: quit treating women like secondary appendages. Quit treating women’s art like it’s a niche, novelty creation only for girls. Quit teaching boys to fear the feminine, quit insisting that it’s a hardship for men to have to relate to anything that doesn’t specifically cater to them.

Because if I can watch Raiders of the Lost Ark and want to grow up to be an archaeologist, there’s no reason at all that a boy shouldn’t be able to read THE DEMON’S LEXICON with its cover on. My friends, sexism doesn’t just hurt women, and our young men’s abysmal rate of attraction to literacy is the proof of it.

The Problem is Not the Books by Saundra Mitchell  (via albinwonderland)

abiss:

Don’t Assault People. 

ahhhhhhh this is so good it has broken my brain. how are women ever supposed to not feel responsible if they are sexually assaulted unless we stop telling them that they are responsible for being sexually assaulted?
twistedtheory:

(Y)

twistedtheory:

(Y)

(Source: staypozitive)

(Source: )

Men are 150 percent more likely to be the victims of violent crimes than women are. Men are more likely to be both victims and perpetrators of crimes. Men are more likely to be assaulted, injured, or killed when alcohol is involved. Men are more likely to be victimized by a stranger (63 percent of violent victimizations), whereas women are more likely to be victimized by someone they know (62 percent of violent victimizations). Women are more likely to be victimized in their home or in the home of someone they know, whereas men are more likely to be victimized in public.

And yet it is women who are treated to “suggestions” about how to protect themselves from public stranger assaults: go out with a friend, don’t drink too much, don’t walk home alone, take a self-defense class. Well-meaning as they may be, suggestions send the false message that women can prevent rape. Certainly, on an individual basis, self-defense and other trainings do help women to protect themselves. But while these trainings are invaluable for the women they assist, they place all of the responsibility on the individual women who use them — in other words, they are not the answer to dismantling rape culture.

Jill Filipovic, Offensive Feminism: The Conservative Gender Norms That Perpetuate Rape Culture, and How Feminists Can Fight Back (via inherhipstheresrevolutions)

(Source: lipsbetweenthehips)

BBC News - Six dead after US breakfast killing spree in Kentucky 

some people worry about Islamic community centers and the shadowy figures of Muslim terrorists. sure, they’re out there. but what really scares the shit out of me is the frequency of things like this.

what kind of people are we creating and encouraging as a society? what has gone so wrong that killing sprees have became a more-than-monthly occurrence?

HULK NOT DOWN WITH COMPLACENCY IN THE FACE OF HEGEMONY. IF THAT’S “JUST THE WAY IT IS,” LET’S FUCK IT UP!

more for your money

so I’ve been doing some transcription work for a research company to make a little money. I don’t mind the medical transcription I’ve been doing (I’ve learned all about medicating schizophrenia…) but I hate this focus group that I’m working on. it’s making me feel like people (Americans?) are greedy, pig-headed bitches. they want healthy options, but they also want dessert and enormous portions. they react to every question about portions like they’re being tricked out of money and like they should eat enough in one sitting to keep them full for the rest of the day. I personally can’t remember the last time I was in a restaurant and the portions looked like something I would consider a single meal and not about five. I get mad about $80 string bikinis and $200 sunglasses. these people get mad enough to complain to the manager if their $5 plate of food isn’t enough for them to feel completely stuffed, bitch about the lack of flavor (at a restaurant comparable to Denny’s or Bob Evans??) and the waitress’s inability to predict what kinds of hot sauce they want, and then want to know why the waitresses spend so much time on smoke breaks?

"Food Companies Are Placing the Onus for Safety on Consumers," NY Times 

Other companies do not even know who is supplying their ingredients, let alone if those suppliers are screening the items for microbes and other potential dangers, interviews and documents show.

Yet the supply chain for ingredients in processed foods — from flavorings to flour to fruits and vegetables — is becoming more complex and global as the drive to keep food costs down intensifies. As a result, almost every element, not just red meat and poultry, is now a potential carrier of pathogens, government and industry officials concede.


this concerns the fuck out of me!!!

something has gone very wrong in our priorities

a serious post for once

disclaimer: what I am about to say is in no way an attack on certain lovely people who received awards today at Commencement (which would include me as well). it is more a reflection on seventeen years of academic awards ceremonies and certain trends of which I am becoming more and more aware.


three things which our education system rewards that make Kate uncomfortable:

competition
neuroticism
an over-emphasis on the role of leadership and service in academic achievement


disclaimer part two: while leadership and community service are important things, and certainly commendable, the fact that they are made a requisite of so many academic awards bothers me. for one, it privileges extroverts. for another, the number of leadership awards and the emphasis on leadership often seems to outweigh emphasis on academic scholarship. it also means that, in a setting like a high school or college, only leadership of school-recognized organizations is considered. similarly, what counts as service is limited to structured or traditionally recognized types of community service.

More Information